top of page

Natural

"PHOTO STYLE"

-5

CONTRAST

-5

SHARPNESS

+3

NOISE

-0

COLOR

-1-0

HIGHLIGHT SHADOW

OFF

iDYNAMIC

OFF

iRESOLUTION

16-255

LUMINANCE LEVEL

 REAL  RATINGS

After testing each lens-sensor combo, I like to know if the rendering is going to look realistic (or not) as this will affect how easy it is to "shot match" (to other lenses).

Greyscale Landscape

CONTRAST

 IS THE CONTRAST "REAL"? 

Black and White Building

SHARPNESS

 IS THE SHARPNESS "REAL"? 

Lucid

NOISE

 IS THE NOISE "REAL"? 

Too-Much-Bokeh.jpg

COLOR

 IS THE COLOR "REAL"? 

*Click here to learn more about "REAL" Ratings. These ratings are AFTER my custom settings are applied (most combos don't look real good with default settings).

Published: 

August 13, 2021 at 11:46:10 PM

[Needs a LUT to finalize, if I add this Highlight Shadow compensation. The highlights were a little bit too bright without the B+W F-PRO UV filter, so I'm trying to compensate with Shadow Highlight, to -1-0. This test used the settings from the Panasonic G85 + BOOST (Viltrox NF-M43x) and all I had to change was to add 1 positive point to the CONTRAST (because the Viltrox focal reducer lowers the contrast a bit).

My goal for these camera settings is to improve the "lens-sensor relationship" by adjusting the contrast, sharpness, noise reduction and color with the result that it produces an image that looks less "digital" and more "organic" (more like film, etc). The first step is to apply these settings while shooting (produces an image that looks pretty good straight out of camera) but keep in mind there may need to be slight color grading (or a LUT) applied to finalize each shot.

 SPECIAL THANKS TO
ADS_Logos_UsedPhotoPro.jpg
ADS_Logos_Gaffer-Power_edited.jpg
bottom of page