top of page

Natural

"PHOTO STYLE"

CONTRAST

SHARPNESS

NOISE

COLOR

HIGHLIGHT SHADOW

OFF

iDYNAMIC

OFF

iRESOLUTION

16-255

LUMINANCE LEVEL

 REAL  RATINGS

After testing each lens-sensor combo, I like to know if the rendering is going to look realistic (or not) as this will affect how easy it is to "shot match" (to other lenses).

Greyscale Landscape

CONTRAST

 IS THE CONTRAST "REAL"? 

Black and White Building

SHARPNESS

 IS THE SHARPNESS "REAL"? 

Lucid

NOISE

 IS THE NOISE "REAL"? 

Too-Much-Bokeh.jpg

COLOR

 IS THE COLOR "REAL"? 

*Click here to learn more about "REAL" Ratings. These ratings are AFTER my custom settings are applied (most combos don't look real good with default settings).

Published: 

May 3, 2023 at 9:48:34 PM


(I will be doing 2 different tests here: One for sports action (stills) for printing to an 8x10 printer, and the second is my normal test for video purposes...starting to test now.)

PHOTO Settings:
(More SHARPNESS is needed the printing process reduces the apparent sharpness due to the substrate, inks, etc.)

TEST #1 = NATURAL -0+2+3-1 HS -2+2 (Needs more SHARPNESS, more NR, more COLOR)
TEST #2 = NATURAL -0+4+5-0 HS -2+2 (Not sure yet)
TEST #3 = NATURAL +4+5+4+1 HS -2+3
TEST #4 = NATURAL +4+4+4-1 HS -2+3 (FINAL)

VIDEO Settings:

My goal for these camera settings is to improve the "lens-sensor relationship" by adjusting the contrast, sharpness, noise reduction and color with the result that it produces an image that looks less "digital" and more "organic" (more like film, etc). The first step is to apply these settings while shooting (produces an image that looks pretty good straight out of camera) but keep in mind there may need to be slight color grading (or a LUT) applied to finalize each shot.

 SPECIAL THANKS TO
ADS_Logos_UsedPhotoPro.jpg
ADS_Logos_Gaffer-Power_edited.jpg
bottom of page